Best Class-Action Law Firms in Minnesota
Class action litigation requires specialized legal expertise that few law firms possess. Minnesota hosts several top-tier class action firms with proven track records in complex multi-party litigation, consumer protection cases, and corporate disputes. These firms handle cases ranging from consumer fraud and defective products to securities violations and employment disputes.
Claims administrators and law firms seeking partnership opportunities or referral relationships need to understand which Minnesota firms offer the strongest capabilities in class action work. The top rated Minnesota class action lawyers bring decades of experience managing large-scale litigation from initial filing through trial and appeals. Selecting the right firm depends on case complexity, industry expertise, and the firm's resources to handle extensive discovery and settlement administration.
1) Hellmuth & Johnson
Hellmuth & Johnson stands as a Top 15 Minnesota law firm with extensive experience in class action litigation. The firm operates four office locations throughout Minnesota with 70 attorneys.
Founded in 1994 as a two-attorney practice, the firm has grown to become the 12th largest law firm in Minnesota. Their class action attorneys handle complex litigation at state, national, and international levels.
The firm's class action team manages cases through trial and appeal. They represent clients ranging from individuals to multinational Fortune 500 companies across multiple jurisdictions including Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota, Iowa, Illinois, and New York.
Hellmuth & Johnson focuses on transactional law, litigation, and appeals with attorneys recognized as leaders in their practice areas. The firm maintains high client retention rates and has earned Super Lawyers recognition along with Martindale-Hubbell AV Peer Review ratings.
Their multidisciplinary approach covers construction, finance, patent litigation, business law, and estate planning alongside their class action practice.
2) Robins Kaplan LLP
Robins Kaplan LLP operates as one of Minnesota's leading class action litigation firms with over 225 attorneys across seven major cities. The firm was named Minnesota Law Firm of the Year by Benchmark Litigation in 2024.
The firm specializes in both pursuing and defending class action claims for corporate clients. Their attorneys handle complex commercial litigation with proven trial experience to manage risk and maximize strategic outcomes.
Robins Kaplan holds the #1 ranking in the Top 50 Cases with Settlements Reaching Final Approval from 2009-2024. They also rank among the Top 25 Lead Counsel in Number of Settlements for antitrust class actions.
Recent notable work includes the Powers v. McDonough case, where the firm secured court judgments holding the Department of Veterans Affairs accountable for housing veterans with disabilities. This demonstrates their capability in high-stakes federal litigation.
The firm has 184 attorneys and generated $149.9 million in gross revenue according to the National Law Journal's 2025 NLJ 500 ranking. Seventy-one attorneys received recognition in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 edition.
3) Pritzker Hageman
Pritzker Hageman operates as a nationally recognized personal injury law firm based in Minneapolis. The firm handles class action cases involving explosions, fires, foodborne illness, Legionnaires' disease, and defective medical products.
The firm maintains strong credentials with consistent recognition. U.S. News & World Report has recognized Pritzker Hageman as one of the best law firms for personal injury litigation every year since 2012.
Frederick H. Pritzker founded the firm and graduated from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1976. Managing partner Eric Hageman was named to Minnesota Monthly's 2024 Top Lawyers list through peer review surveys.
The firm demonstrates substantial case experience against Fortune 500 companies. They specialize in complex litigation requiring extensive resources and expertise.
Pritzker Hageman maintains high client satisfaction ratings. Elite Litigators shows the firm has 94% exceptional reviews with a 4.8-star rating from actual clients.
Claims administrators working with class action settlements will find the firm handles multi-plaintiff cases efficiently. Their Minneapolis location provides regional access for Minnesota-based litigation matters.
4) Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP
Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP operates as a boutique litigation firm specializing in complex commercial disputes and class action cases. The Minneapolis-based firm handles environmental law, product liability, employment law, and consumer protection matters.
The firm earned recognition as a Tier 1 Metropolitan Best Law Firm in environmental law by U.S. News - Best Lawyers. This ranking demonstrates their expertise in environmental litigation and regulatory compliance matters.
Five attorneys from the firm received inclusion in the 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Partners Richard Lockridge, Charles Nauen, Susan Ellingstad, and Yvonne Flaherty earned this recognition, which identifies the top five percent of practicing attorneys nationwide.
The firm's environmental law team leads cases involving contamination, regulatory enforcement, and corporate environmental compliance. Their employment law department represents both businesses and governmental clients in federal and state courts across multiple jurisdictions.
Lockridge Grindal Nauen maintains a focused approach to class action lawsuits, handling cases involving defective products, environmental damages, and employment violations. Their attorneys regularly appear in Minnesota federal and state courts.
5) Gray Plant Mooty
Gray Plant Mooty was established in Minneapolis in 1866 and operated as one of Minnesota's oldest continuing law practices. The firm maintained offices in Minneapolis, St. Cloud, Fargo, and Washington D.C.
In 2020, Gray Plant Mooty merged with Lathrop Gage to form Lathrop GPM. This combination brought together two century-old firms with strong Midwestern foundations.
The firm handled class action and complex litigation matters throughout its operations. Their attorneys worked on multiparty cases at state, national, and international levels.
Gray Plant Mooty operated nine practice groups before the merger. The firm served clients across various legal areas including business law, real estate, and litigation matters.
Claims administrators and law firms previously worked with Gray Plant Mooty attorneys on complex class action settlements. The firm's experience in handling large-scale litigation made it a recognized name in Minnesota's legal community.
Following the 2020 merger, former Gray Plant Mooty clients and cases transitioned to Lathrop GPM. Some attorneys from the firm later joined other practices, including Philadelphia-based Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr.
6) Lommen Abdo
Lommen Abdo operates as a multi-faceted midwest-based law firm with approximately 30 attorneys serving Minnesota and Wisconsin. The firm maintains its primary office in Minneapolis with additional presence in Wisconsin.
The firm handles class action litigation alongside other complex commercial disputes. Lommen Abdo receives recognition for appellate advocacy and professional liability matters from U.S. News & World Report's Best Law Firms rankings.
Twenty attorneys at the firm have earned Super Lawyers or Rising Stars designations. This recognition indicates peer acknowledgment of their legal abilities across multiple practice areas.
Martindale-Hubbell awards Lommen Abdo its highest rating for legal ability. The firm's appellate experience proves valuable for class action cases that may require appeals court representation.
The attorneys handle medical malpractice, legal malpractice, and contract disputes. These skills transfer effectively to class action work requiring similar litigation expertise.
Claims administrators working with Minnesota class actions may encounter Lommen Abdo representing plaintiff classes or individual claimants. The firm's established reputation and appellate capabilities make them a notable presence in Minnesota's legal landscape for complex litigation matters.
7) Fafinski Mark & Johnson
Fafinski Mark & Johnson is a full-service commercial law firm based in Minneapolis that has operated since 1999. The firm focuses on providing big-firm expertise with small-firm customer service at reduced costs.
FMJ handles multiple practice areas including aviation, insurance, litigation, real estate, intellectual property, and estate planning. Their approach combines sophisticated legal knowledge with responsive client service.
The firm has earned recognition in Best Law Firms rankings across eight different practice areas. This recognition comes from peer reviews, client evaluations, and industry leader interviews.
Sixteen FMJ attorneys received recognition on the 2025 Best Lawyers in America list. The firm also placed eighteen attorneys on the 2026 Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch lists.
For claims administrators, FMJ offers commercial litigation services with their established track record in complex business disputes. Their litigation team handles both commercial and employment-related cases.
The firm's business model emphasizes accessibility and cost-effectiveness while maintaining legal sophistication. This approach appeals to clients seeking quality representation without premium pricing typical of larger firms.
8) Roberts, Jadd and Roberts, P.A.
Roberts, Jadd and Roberts, P.A. operates as a Minnesota-based law firm with experience in complex litigation matters. The firm handles class-action cases alongside other commercial litigation work.
Managing Partner Mike Roberts leads the firm's class-action practice. He has been appointed to leadership roles in multiple complex commercial cases involving antitrust violations.
The firm participated in significant nationwide litigation including Microsoft antitrust cases and Pilot Flying J Rebate Litigation. These cases demonstrate their capability in handling large-scale class-action matters.
Roberts, Jadd and Roberts focuses on antitrust and complex commercial litigation. Their experience includes cases with indirect purchaser claims and multi-district litigation coordination.
The firm's track record shows successful early settlements in major commercial disputes. Claims administrators working with this firm can expect structured case management and professional communication throughout the litigation process.
Their Minnesota location provides strategic advantages for Midwest-based class actions. The firm maintains relationships with co-counsel networks for nationwide case coordination when needed.
9) Parker Daniels Kibort LLC
Parker Daniels Kibort LLC operates as a boutique law firm in Minneapolis specializing in complex commercial litigation. The firm maintains a selective client base of major corporations, small businesses, and institutional clients.
The firm's trial attorneys have secured significant litigation victories in both state and federal courts. Recent achievements include a $1.7 million settlement and a $2.2 million verdict in defamation cases.
Parker Daniels Kibort earned recognition as the Leading Commercial Litigation Law Firm of the Year 2024 for Minnesota. The firm has seven attorneys selected to Super Lawyers or Rising Stars lists, indicating peer recognition within the legal community.
The firm handles appellate advocacy, banking litigation, and entertainment law matters. Their downtown Minneapolis location positions them strategically for serving corporate clients and institutional entities requiring litigation services.
Claims administrators working with Parker Daniels Kibort can expect aggressive representation and innovative legal strategies. The firm's track record demonstrates capability in high-stakes commercial disputes and complex litigation matters requiring specialized expertise.
Their experienced trial team focuses on delivering efficient solutions to intricate legal problems. The firm's boutique structure allows for personalized attention while maintaining the resources necessary for major litigation cases.
10) Lindquist & Vennum
Lindquist & Vennum LLP was a law firm with approximately 170 attorneys serving corporate, governmental, and individual clients. The firm operated from offices in Minnesota, Colorado, and South Dakota.
The firm provided corporate finance, transactional, and litigation services across multiple practice areas. Their attorneys handled complex business matters including antitrust, banking law, mergers and acquisitions, and securities law.
Lindquist & Vennum served clients nationwide and internationally for nearly four decades. The firm's roots dated back to 1946, establishing a long history in legal practice.
Their litigation capabilities extended to various areas including civil rights, employment law, and commercial disputes. The firm maintained expertise in class action and multiparty litigation matters.
Claims administrators and law firms previously worked with Lindquist & Vennum on corporate transactions and complex litigation matters. The firm's attorneys provided counsel on regulatory compliance and dispute resolution.
The Minneapolis-based firm was recognized among Minnesota's largest law practices. They handled cases at state, national, and international levels through trial and appeal processes.
How Class Actions Work in Minnesota
Minnesota class actions follow specific state and federal rules that determine eligibility, certification requirements, and procedural timelines. The process involves strict filing requirements, encompasses various case types from consumer protection to employment disputes, and typically spans 2-4 years from initial filing to resolution.
Filing Requirements and Certification
Minnesota courts require plaintiffs to meet four key criteria for class certification under Rule 23. The class must be so numerous that joining all members is impractical, typically requiring at least 40 members.
Common questions of law or fact must predominate among class members. The representative plaintiff's claims must be typical of the entire class. The representative must adequately protect the interests of all class members.
Additional Minnesota Requirements:
- Detailed motion for class certification within 90 days of filing
- Proof of adequate legal representation
- Demonstration that class action is superior to individual lawsuits
- Notice plan approval for reaching all potential class members
Claims administrators should prepare comprehensive member databases early in the process. Minneapolis class action attorneys handle these complex certification requirements regularly.
Common Types of Class-Action Cases
Consumer protection cases dominate Minnesota class actions, particularly those involving financial institutions and deceptive business practices. Consumer rights violations frequently result in class certification when companies engage in systematic wrongdoing.
Primary Case Categories:
- Consumer fraud: False advertising, billing errors, data breaches
- Employment violations: Wage theft, discrimination, benefits disputes
- Product liability: Defective products causing
Selecting the Right Class-Action Law Firm
The choice of legal representation can determine the success of your class-action case. Key factors include proven track record, specialized expertise, and adequate resources to handle complex litigation through trial and appeal.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Legal Representation
Experience in Class-Action Litigation stands as the most critical factor. Look for firms that have handled cases similar to yours in both size and subject matter. Firms with decades of class-action experience understand the unique procedural requirements and certification standards.
Financial Resources determine whether a firm can sustain lengthy litigation. Class-action cases require substantial upfront investment for expert witnesses, discovery, and case development. Firms must demonstrate they can fund cases through trial without compromising quality.
Track Record of Settlements and Verdicts provides concrete evidence of success. Review specific case outcomes, settlement amounts, and the firm's ability to achieve class certification. Choosing the right class action lawyer requires examining their history of favorable results.
Specialized Knowledge in your case type matters significantly. Securities fraud requires different expertise than consumer protection or employment law. Firms should demonstrate deep understanding of relevant statutes and regulations.
Team Structure and Staffing affects case management quality. Large class actions require dedicated teams including senior partners, associate attorneys, paralegals, and support staff. Adequate staffing ensures thorough case preparation and client communication.
Questions to Ask During an Initial Consultation
Case Assessment Questions should focus on certification prospects and potential damages. Ask attorneys to evaluate the strength of your case and likelihood of class certification. Request their assessment of potential settlement ranges based on similar cases.
Resource and Timeline Questions clarify the firm's commitment. Ask about anticipated costs, timeline to resolution, and how they plan to fund the litigation. Understand their caseload and how much attention your case will receive.
Strategy and Communication Questions establish expectations. Request details about litigation strategy, discovery plans, and communication frequency. Expert tips for success include understanding how firms will keep you informed throughout the process.
Fee Structure Clarification prevents future disputes. Understand contingency fee percentages, expense responsibilities, and how costs are calculated. Ask about fee arrangements if the case settles early versus going to trial.
References and Case Examples provide verification of capabilities. Request contact information for previous clients and specific examples of similar cases they have handled successfully.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claims administrators and law firms often require specific information about selecting and working with class-action attorneys in Minnesota. These questions address key considerations for professional partnerships and case management decisions.
What factors should I consider when choosing a law firm for a class-action lawsuit?
Experience in class-action litigation stands as the most critical factor when selecting legal representation. Class action attorneys in Minneapolis require specialized knowledge of complex procedural requirements and multiparty litigation management.
Firm size directly impacts resource allocation and case handling capacity. Larger firms typically manage multiple concurrent cases while maintaining dedicated support staff for document review and discovery processes.
Geographic presence affects local court relationships and procedural familiarity. Minnesota-based firms understand state-specific filing requirements and judicial preferences that influence case outcomes.
Fee structures vary significantly between firms, with most operating on contingency arrangements. Claims administrators should evaluate percentage rates and cost-sharing agreements before engagement.
Which law firms are recognized for their success in class-action cases in Minnesota?
Hellmuth & Johnson maintains a prominent position in Minnesota class-action litigation. The firm handles state, national, and international multiparty cases through trial and appellate phases.
Robins Kaplan LLP demonstrates extensive experience in complex litigation matters. Their class-action practice spans multiple industries and jurisdictions.
Pritzker Hageman specializes in consumer protection and product liability class actions. The firm focuses on food safety and defective product cases.
Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP handles significant class-action matters throughout Minnesota. Gray Plant Mooty rounds out the top-tier firms with substantial class-action capabilities.
How can I determine the track record of a law firm in managing class-action lawsuits?
Case outcome databases provide concrete settlement amounts and verdict information. Minnesota class action lawyers receive detailed performance ratings from previous clients and peer attorneys.
Court records reveal motion success rates and procedural efficiency metrics. Claims administrators can review docket entries to assess case management timelines and judicial interactions.
Professional disciplinary records indicate ethical compliance and bar standing. These reports identify any sanctions or regulatory issues affecting firm operations.
Client testimonials from institutional plaintiffs offer practical insights into working relationships. Corporate clients provide more relevant feedback than individual consumer plaintiffs for claims administrator needs.
What are the typical services provided by top-notch class-action law firms?
Case evaluation services include preliminary damage assessments and class certification analysis. Firms determine viability before accepting representation agreements.
Discovery management encompasses document production coordination and expert witness procurement. Electronic discovery platforms require specialized technical resources and security protocols.
Settlement administration coordination involves working directly with claims administrators on distribution mechanisms. Firms facilitate court approval processes and regulatory compliance requirements.
Trial preparation includes jury selection strategies and courtroom presentation development. Appeal services extend representation through higher court proceedings when necessary.
Can you name some prominent attorneys in Minnesota who specialize in class-action litigation?
Individual attorney identification requires specific case research beyond general firm recognition. Partner-level attorneys typically handle class certification motions and settlement negotiations.
Senior associates manage day-to-day case administration and client communication. These attorneys coordinate with claims administrators on procedural matters and timeline management.
Specialized counsel focus on particular practice areas within class-action law. Consumer protection, securities fraud, and product liability require distinct expertise sets.
Attorney bar admissions in multiple jurisdictions expand case handling capabilities. National class actions benefit from counsel admitted in various state and federal courts.
How does a firm's location, like 8050 West 78th Street, Edina, impact its class-action services?
Suburban locations often provide lower overhead costs compared to downtown Minneapolis offices. These savings potentially translate to reduced legal fees for claims administrators and plaintiffs.
Proximity to federal courthouse facilities affects meeting convenience and filing efficiency. Edina maintains reasonable access to both state and federal court systems.
Parking availability and client meeting spaces influence administrative efficiency. Suburban offices typically offer more convenient access for document review sessions and depositions.
Technology infrastructure varies by location and building specifications. Modern office complexes provide enhanced security and communication capabilities for sensitive case materials.