Best Class-Action Law Firms in Maryland

Class-action lawsuits require specialized legal expertise and resources that only certain law firms possess. Maryland offers several top-tier class-action law firms with proven track records in complex litigation, data breach cases, and mass tort claims. These firms serve both plaintiffs and defendants across various industries and practice areas.

Claims administrators and law firms seeking partnership or representation need firms with substantial experience handling large-scale litigation. Maryland class action attorneys range from boutique practices to full-service firms, each offering different strengths in areas like consumer protection, securities litigation, and corporate accountability cases.

1) Joseph Greenwald & Laake (JGL)

Joseph Greenwald & Laake stands as a leading data breach law firm in Maryland with over 50 years of experience. The firm has served as lead counsel in major data breach class actions, including the Marriott Data Breach Litigation.

JGL handles complex state and federal civil disputes across multiple practice areas. Their class action expertise spans medical malpractice, qui tam cases, and large-scale data breach litigation.

The firm represents individuals, small businesses, and large corporations in high-stakes legal matters. Claims administrators work with JGL on cases involving multimillion-dollar settlements and complex dispute resolution.

JGL received recognition on the 2025 Best Law Firms list and maintains strong ratings from legal industry publications. The firm operates from multiple Maryland locations including Rockville, Greenbelt, and Frederick.

Their collaborative approach with co-counsel and positive judicial relationships make them effective in multi-party litigation. JGL's track record includes successful resolution of some of the largest data breaches in history.

2) Gordon, Wolf & Carney

Gordon, Wolf & Carney operates as a Maryland class action law firm serving clients nationwide in mass tort and class action litigation. The firm has been in practice for over 20 years.

The firm has achieved significant financial recoveries for plaintiffs. They have recovered over one billion dollars in class action and mass tort cases. Their certified class counsel status in dozens of successful cases has resulted in more than $100 million in relief for clients.

Gordon, Wolf & Carney focuses on representing individuals against large corporations and institutions. They handle cases involving defective products, insurance claim denials, and systematic illegal practices by companies.

The firm maintains offices in both Hunt Valley and Towson, Maryland. Their legal team specializes in both Social Security Disability and class action litigation. They represent clients in cases against lending institutions, automobile companies, and insurance firms.

Gordon, Wolf & Carney has received recognition in U.S. News and World Reports' listing of Best Law Firms in America. The firm earned rankings in both national and metropolitan categories for Mass Torts and Class Actions for Plaintiffs.

3) Semmes, Bowen & Semmes

Semmes, Bowen & Semmes stands as one of Maryland's oldest and largest full-service law firms. The firm operates with 53 attorneys across five strategic locations including Baltimore, Hagerstown, McLean, Washington D.C., and Martinsburg.

The firm maintains extensive litigation capabilities that extend to class-action matters. Their attorneys handle complex commercial disputes and multi-party litigation across various practice areas.

Semmes has earned recognition in the 2022 U.S. News Best Lawyers rankings, demonstrating peer and client confidence in their legal services. The firm received National Tier 3 ranking in Admiralty & Maritime Law.

Their insurance practice earned Band 2 recognition in the 2022 Chambers USA guide. This ranking reflects their capability in handling insurance-related class actions and coverage disputes.

The firm's corporate and business law practice provides comprehensive representation for entities facing class-action exposure. They offer strategic counsel on compliance matters and risk management.

Claims administrators benefit from Semmes' multi-jurisdictional presence and established relationships with courts throughout the Mid-Atlantic region. Their Baltimore headquarters positions them advantageously for Maryland state court proceedings.

4) Silverman Thompson Slutkin White

Silverman Thompson Slutkin White operates as a premier litigation firm in the Mid-Atlantic region with offices in Baltimore, Towson, Washington D.C., and New York. The firm handles complex civil litigation matters including class action cases.

Their attorneys spend hundreds to thousands of hours in courtrooms annually. The firm takes on high-stakes civil litigation and criminal defense cases throughout Maryland and the Mid-Atlantic region.

Founded in 1994 as a solo practice, the firm has grown into a recognized litigation powerhouse. They represent clients in administrative law, business litigation, and class action matters.

The firm earned recognition in the 2025 Best Law Firms rankings by Best Lawyers for the Baltimore metropolitan area. Nine practice areas received top rankings, demonstrating their diverse expertise.

Silverman Thompson's team includes former state and federal prosecutors. This background provides valuable insight for complex litigation matters and class action defense strategies.

The firm maintains a collaborative approach across practice areas. This interdisciplinary method helps serve clients facing multi-faceted legal challenges in class action and business litigation contexts.

5) Rees Broome, PC

Rees Broome, PC operates as a Virginia-based law firm with 50 attorneys and maintains offices in both Maryland and Virginia. The firm has served the Washington DC metro area since 1974.

The firm handles civil litigation matters including class-action cases. Their litigation team works on construction defect liability, employment disputes, and commercial real estate issues.

Rees Broome maintains locations at 7101 Wisconsin Ave Suite 1201 in Bethesda, Maryland and 7430 Heritage Village Plaza Suite 202 in Gainesville, Virginia. The Bethesda office can be reached at 301-222-0152.

Eight attorneys from the firm have received Super Lawyers or Rising Stars recognition. The firm offers resources comparable to larger firms while maintaining personalized client service.

Their practice areas include corporate law, employment law, tax matters, and creditors' rights work. For claims administrators and law firms seeking litigation counsel in Maryland, Rees Broome provides established expertise across multiple practice areas.

6) Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler operates as a New York-based firm with approximately 200 attorneys. The firm has established itself as a major player in class action defense, regularly securing dismissals and resolving threatened actions before complaints are filed.

More than half of the firm's attorneys focus on litigation matters. They bring trial experience and commercial business knowledge to sophisticated cases.

The firm's false advertising practice serves brands in food and beverage, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals sectors. They handle high-stakes litigation and regulatory proceedings in these industries.

Patterson Belknap has 171 attorneys according to the National Law Journal's 2025 rankings. The firm generated $266,135,000 in gross revenue and ranks 251st nationally.

Their litigation department handles complex commercial cases with emphasis on class action defense and intellectual property matters. The firm has defeated numerous consumer fraud cases through dispositive motions.

Patterson Belknap also represents institutional plaintiffs in RMBS litigation. They regularly act for monoline insurers in high-value actions against financial institutions, securing multimillion-dollar settlements.

7) Ross, Aronstam & Moritz LLP

Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP operates as a litigation boutique specializing in corporate and commercial litigation in Delaware courts. The firm maintains its headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware with 18 attorneys.

The firm focuses primarily on M&A litigation and disputes in the Delaware Court of Chancery. They represent major corporations and national law firms in complex commercial matters.

Ross Aronstam & Moritz handles sales process disputes, books and records inspection requests, and fiduciary duty breach cases. The firm serves as Delaware counsel for numerous Fortune 500 companies.

Legal industry publications consistently recognize the firm's expertise. Benchmark Litigation ranked the firm "Highly Recommended" and named it Delaware Firm of the Year for three consecutive years.

The Legal 500 US identifies Ross Aronstam & Moritz as one of only three Delaware firms recognized nationally for M&A litigation excellence. Sources describe the firm as highly effective in complex commercial cases.

For claims administrators handling Delaware corporate matters, the firm's specialized focus on Chancery Court proceedings provides targeted expertise in corporate governance disputes and merger-related litigation.

8) Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. operates as an Am Law 200 firm with approximately 200 attorneys across nine offices in Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C., and New York. The firm maintains substantial class action defense capabilities in both federal and state courts nationwide.

The firm's class action team has earned recognition within the legal community for their defense work. Miles & Stockbridge attorneys have been selected to author the Maryland section of the American Bar Association's Class Action Survey for several consecutive years.

According to the 2025 NLJ 500 rankings, the firm generated $135,807,000 in gross revenue and ranks 257th nationally by size. The firm covers more than 120 practice areas across 15+ industries including manufacturing, real estate, and finance.

Miles & Stockbridge received national Tier 1 rankings from U.S. News Best Lawyers for banking and finance law, public finance law, and tax law. The firm also earned Tier 2 recognition for appellate practice and commercial litigation.

The firm serves businesses of various sizes with regional, national, and international capabilities through its TerraLex network membership.

9) Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLC

Whiteford, Taylor & Preston operates as a full-service law firm with over 200 attorneys across 16 offices in the Mid-Atlantic region. The firm maintains a strong presence in mass tort and class action litigation with national recognition.

The firm earned Tier 1 national rankings for bankruptcy and environmental law practices from U.S. News and World Report Best Lawyers. Twenty-two practice areas received national-level rankings in 2021.

Founded in 1933, Whiteford serves clients ranging from startups to Fortune 100 companies. The firm has 96 partners and 81 other lawyers under managing partner Martin T. Fletcher.

Their geographic footprint spans Delaware, Washington D.C., Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. This allows them to handle regional, national, and global matters effectively.

The Baltimore-based firm specializes in complex business litigation, including securities, consumer protection, and employment class actions. They provide comprehensive legal services across multiple practice areas including banking, corporate law, and environmental matters.

Claims administrators work with Whiteford on settlement administration and class action case management matters throughout their coverage areas.

10) Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP

Brown, Goldstein & Levy operates as a Baltimore-based law firm founded in 1982. The firm maintains offices in both Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, D.C.

The firm has secured victories in class action lawsuits across multiple areas. These include mass torts, housing discrimination, tax disputes, employment matters, and false advertising cases.

U.S. News & World Reports ranks the firm in Tier 1 for Baltimore Mass Tort Litigation and Class Actions - Plaintiffs. Best Lawyers also recognizes their class action capabilities.

Brown, Goldstein & Levy employs between 19-24 attorneys according to various legal directories. The firm focuses on both civil and criminal litigation matters.

The practice areas extend beyond class actions to include complex commercial litigation, civil rights, healthcare law, and family law. Their multimillion dollar litigation experience spans decades.

Nineteen attorneys from the firm have been selected to Super Lawyers or Rising Stars lists. This recognition indicates peer acknowledgment of their legal skills.

The firm positions itself as client-centered while maintaining community involvement. They handle cases ranging from individual matters to large-scale class action litigation.

What to Know About Class-Action Lawsuits in Maryland

Maryland class-action lawsuits allow groups of people with similar legal claims to sue defendants together in state or federal court. The state has specific certification requirements and procedural rules that govern how these cases proceed through the legal system.

Common Types of Class-Action Cases

Data Breach Litigation represents one of the most frequent class-action types in Maryland. Companies that experience security breaches face lawsuits from affected customers seeking damages for compromised personal information.

Consumer Protection Cases target businesses accused of deceptive practices, defective products, or false advertising. These lawsuits often involve retail companies, manufacturers, and service providers.

Employment Law Violations include wage theft, overtime disputes, and discrimination claims. Workers join together to challenge company policies that affect multiple employees.

Securities Fraud cases involve investors who lost money due to misleading financial statements or market manipulation. Stock ownership notifications are common in these situations.

Product Liability Claims arise when defective products cause harm to multiple consumers. Pharmaceutical drugs, medical devices, and consumer goods frequently generate these lawsuits.

Maryland courts require strict compliance with Rule 2-231 for class certification. The court must find that common legal or factual questions exist among all class members.

Numerosity standards require too many plaintiffs to make individual lawsuits practical. No specific number is mandated, but typically dozens or hundreds of potential members are needed.

Adequacy of Representation means lead plaintiffs and their attorneys must fairly protect all class members' interests. The court examines potential conflicts and attorney qualifications.

Predominance requires common issues to outweigh individual differences among class members. This prevents cases where each person's situation varies significantly.

Filing options include Maryland state courts or federal court depending on jurisdictional requirements. Federal diversity jurisdiction applies when defendants and plaintiffs are from different states and damages exceed $75,000.

Timeline and Process Overview

Initial Filing begins when attorneys file a complaint and motion for class certification. This typically occurs within 60-90 days of case initiation.

Discovery Phase allows both sides to gather evidence supporting or opposing class certification. This process usually takes 6-12 months depending on case complexity.

Certification Hearing determines whether the case meets all requirements to proceed as a class action. Courts may approve, deny, or modify the proposed class definition.

Notice Requirements mandate informing all potential class members about the lawsuit once certification is granted. Class action lawyers in Maryland must ensure proper notification methods reach affected individuals.

Settlement or Trial concludes the case through negotiated agreement or court verdict. Most class actions settle before reaching trial, often taking 2-4 years total.

Claims Administration distributes settlement funds or court-ordered remedies to verified class members through established procedures.

Choosing the Right Class-Action Law Firm

Selecting the appropriate class-action law firm requires evaluating specific qualifications and fee structures. Claims administrators and law firms must assess experience levels, resource availability, and transparent cost arrangements to ensure optimal case outcomes.

Key Factors to Consider

Experience in Class-Action Litigation

The firm's track record in class-action cases directly impacts settlement outcomes. Review their history with similar case types and industries.

Look for attorneys who have handled cases worth $10 million or more. Examine their success rates in obtaining court certifications for class status.

Resources and Staffing

Class-action cases require substantial financial resources and dedicated personnel. The firm must demonstrate capacity to handle discovery, expert witnesses, and lengthy litigation periods.

Evaluate their technology infrastructure for document management. Assess whether they maintain sufficient staff to manage communication with large plaintiff groups.

Reputation Among Courts

Judges often recognize firms with strong class-action practices. This recognition can influence case scheduling and settlement negotiations.

Research the firm's standing with federal and state courts. Choosing the right attorney is essential for complex litigation matters.

Communication Protocols

The firm must establish clear communication systems for updates and documentation. This includes regular reporting schedules and accessible client portals.

Contingency Fee Structure

Most class-action cases operate on contingency arrangements ranging from 25% to 40% of recovery amounts. Higher percentages typically apply to riskier or more complex cases.

Negotiate specific percentage tiers based on settlement timing. Early settlements often warrant lower percentages than cases requiring trial.

Cost Advancement Policies

Firms should advance all case expenses including filing fees, expert witness costs, and discovery expenses. These costs are typically recovered from settlement proceeds.

Clarify which party bears responsibility if the case is unsuccessful. Document expense categories and approval processes for major expenditures.

Fee Transparency Requirements

Request detailed fee agreements outlining all potential charges. Understanding class action lawsuits and their complexity helps in evaluating appropriate fee structures.

Establish expense reporting intervals and approval thresholds. Include provisions for fee disputes and resolution mechanisms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Selecting the right class-action law firm requires evaluating specific criteria including experience, track record, and fee structures. Maryland offers several established firms with proven expertise in complex litigation and data breach cases.

What factors should I consider when choosing a class-action law firm in Maryland?

Experience in your specific case type stands as the primary consideration. Firms specializing in data breaches handle different challenges than those focused on consumer fraud or civil rights violations.

Track record matters significantly. Review recent settlements and verdicts to gauge success rates. Look for firms that have served as lead counsel rather than co-counsel in major cases.

Resources and staffing capacity determine whether a firm can handle complex litigation effectively. Large class actions require substantial investment in discovery, expert witnesses, and case management.

Communication style affects case progression. Class action attorneys in Maryland should provide regular updates and clear explanations of legal strategies.

Can you recommend any top-rated law firms that specialize in class-action lawsuits in Baltimore?

Joseph Greenwald & Laake stands out for data breach litigation. The firm served as lead counsel in the Marriott data breach case, one of the largest breaches in history.

Gordon, Wolf & Carney focuses on consumer protection and fraud cases. They handle cases involving illegal business practices and consumer rights violations.

Semmes, Bowen & Semmes offers broad litigation experience across multiple practice areas. Their class action team handles both plaintiff and defense work.

Mass tort litigation firms receive rankings based on peer reviews and case outcomes. These rankings help identify top performers in the region.

How do I evaluate the experience and success rate of a civil rights attorney for a potential class-action suit in Maryland?

Request specific case histories involving similar civil rights violations. Experience with employment discrimination differs from police misconduct or housing discrimination cases.

Settlement amounts and verdict values indicate effectiveness. However, consider case complexity when comparing results across different firms.

Professional recognition through bar associations and legal publications demonstrates peer respect. Awards and rankings from legal organizations provide objective assessments.

Client testimonials offer insights into communication and case handling. Focus on testimonials from institutional clients rather than individual plaintiffs.

Are there any Maryland law firms renowned for handling complex class-action cases?

Joseph Greenwald & Laake has established leadership in data breach litigation. Their collaborative approach with co-counsel and judiciary recognition sets them apart.

Silverman Thompson Slutkin White handles complex commercial litigation including class actions. Their experience spans multiple industries and case types.

Rees Broome, PC focuses on complex litigation with class action capabilities. They represent both plaintiffs and defendants in multi-party disputes.

Firm size and resources directly impact complex case handling ability. Larger firms typically have more resources for lengthy litigation processes.

What are the potential costs and fees associated with hiring a class-action law firm in Maryland?

Most plaintiff-side class action firms work on contingency fee arrangements. Fees typically range from 25% to 40% of any settlement or verdict.

Court costs and litigation expenses remain separate from attorney fees. These can include expert witness fees, document review costs, and filing fees.

Fee structures require court approval in class action settlements. Class action settlements must demonstrate fairness to all class members including fee arrangements.

Some firms advance all litigation costs until case resolution. Others may require clients to cover certain expenses during litigation.

Maryland follows both federal and state rules for class certification. Rule 2-131 of Maryland Rules of Civil Procedure outlines four prerequisites for class actions.

Numerosity requires too many affected parties for individual lawsuits to be practical. Common questions of law or fact must exist among all class members.

Typicality means representative plaintiffs' claims mirror those of absent class members. Adequacy ensures representatives will fairly protect all class interests.

Alternative dispute resolution might be more efficient for smaller groups. Individual lawsuits may be preferable when damages vary significantly among potential class members.

Read more

Customer Support in Payouts Statistics — 41 Critical Facts Every Finance Professional Should Know in 2025

Comprehensive data compiled from extensive research on payment processing and financial services customer support Key Takeaways * Your customer support is your competitive advantage — With 87% of customers considering customer service vital when choosing fintech providers, exceptional support isn't optional—it's business-critical * Speed expectations have dramatically compressed

By Rob Heffernan

Claims Payout Statistics 2024-2025: 37 Key Points Revealing Massive Inefficiencies in Traditional Payment Systems

Comprehensive data compiled from extensive research on global payment processing and claims settlement inefficiencies Key Takeaways * Traditional payment systems are hemorrhaging money through inefficiencies — Up to $170 billion in global insurance premiums at risk by 2027 due to poor claims experiences, with $32 billion lost annually to administrative inefficiencies * Healthcare

By Rob Heffernan

Claims Reconciliation Statistics — 24 Critical Facts Transforming Payment Processing in 2025

Comprehensive data revealing the massive inefficiencies in manual reconciliation and the transformative potential of digital disbursements Key Takeaways * Your reconciliation struggles are shared across the industry — With 58% of companies still manually reconciling accounts and processing taking up to 2 hours per payment rail, your challenges reflect widespread systemic inefficiencies

By Rob Heffernan